The Colorado Court of Appeals' recent decision in Wolven v. Del Rosario Velez marks a significant development in personal injury law, focusing on the admissibility of expert testimony regarding impairment ratings. This ruling, important for its implications in the realm of legal-medical intersections, hinges on how juries evaluate and incorporate medical expertise into verdicts. It's a key example of how legal frameworks adapt to complex medical evaluations, setting a precedent that could influence future personal injury cases. This decision not only clarifies the role [...]